Skip to content

Update github runners to oci gh arc runners #1326

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

koksay
Copy link

@koksay koksay commented Apr 29, 2025

Description

CNCF has hosted ephemeral GitHub runners on Oracle that we want projects to use instead of the GitHub-hosted ones, which now incur a cost to use.

Please direct any questions to me, @jeefy, @krook, and @RobertKielty. (or #cncf-ci-infra channel on the CNCF Slack)

@koksay koksay requested review from a team as code owners April 29, 2025 08:27
@artur-ciocanu
Copy link
Contributor

@cicoyle could you please take a look, I am not sure how CNCF handles this and how Dapr Java SDK should be affected.

Copy link

codecov bot commented May 6, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 77.42%. Comparing base (d759c53) to head (d2fef20).
Report is 136 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #1326      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     76.91%   77.42%   +0.50%     
- Complexity     1592     1764     +172     
============================================
  Files           145      204      +59     
  Lines          4843     5368     +525     
  Branches        562      587      +25     
============================================
+ Hits           3725     4156     +431     
- Misses          821      899      +78     
- Partials        297      313      +16     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link
Contributor

@cicoyle cicoyle left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hello @koksay - thanks for the PR here. Mind providing a link to a discussion or where I may find more information about the reason for this change?

Was there a particular reason for the dapr/java-sdk being chosen for this change? From a dapr ecosystem perspective, we will want consistency across all SDKs.

@koksay
Copy link
Author

koksay commented May 6, 2025

Hi @cicoyle, the main reason is the cost of the runners (for some projects, it's runners on Equinix), and we're visiting all CNCF projects for this change. @jeefy can provide more information here, or you can also join the #cncf-ci-infra channel on the CNCF Slack and ask any questions you may have.

@cicoyle
Copy link
Contributor

cicoyle commented May 6, 2025

inix), and we're visiting all CNCF projects for this chang

Will join and ask for clarification in the slack channel and provide additional context here for future reference

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants